Search for: All records

We develop conservative tests for the mean of a bounded population under stratified sampling and apply them to risk-limiting post-election audits. The tests are "anytime valid" under sequential sampling, allowing optional stopping in each stratum. Our core method expresses a global hypothesis about the population mean as a union of intersection hypotheses describing within-stratum means. It tests each intersection hypothesis using independent test supermartingales (TSMs) combined across strata by multiplication. A P-value for each intersection hypothesis is the reciprocal of that test statistic, and the largest P-value in the union is a P-value for the global hypothesis. This approach has two primary moving parts: the rule selecting which stratum to draw from next given the sample so far, and the form of the TSM within each stratum. These rules may vary over intersection hypotheses. We construct the test with the smallest expected stopping time, and present a few strategies for approximating that optimum. Approximately optimal methods are challenging to compute when there are more than two strata, while some simple rules that scale well can be inconsistent -- the resulting test will never reject for some alternatives, no matter how large the sample. We present a set of rules that leads to a computationally tractable test for arbitrarily many strata. In instances that arise in auditing and other applications, its expected sample size is nearly optimal and substantially smaller than that of previous methods.